Over 58620
politifake

Holy Politics


MUSLIM AMERICANS - They Are in a Muslim Jihadist Holy War




LIBTARDS WHO SAY "NO" AND REPUBTARDS WHO RUN AWAY -


TAGS: liberal democrats republicans holy grail
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

romneyisatool - September 23, 2012, 5:13 pm
LOL hahahahahahaahaha... FUNNIEST.POST.EVER. Good one, Fox. : -)
foxrecon19d - September 23, 2012, 5:10 pm
If todays Republicans were storming the beaches of Normandy, they'd be trying to swim back to England.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 23, 2012, 4:48 pm

Nice one Fox. 5L
romneyisatool - September 23, 2012, 12:10 pm
So true. Love it! 5 stars


THE FUNDAMENTALS - "How to Use the Holy Bible: KJV as a soap- box for every right-wing, conservative, Republican policy--for Dummies."




THE HOLY BIBLE - Banned it communist countries Read it while you can




Holy Sh*t -


TAGS: bible conservatard holy willie aames
Rating: 2.67/5

More politifakes by CthulthuDownUnder

Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 27, 2014, 7:03 pm

I have never given out permanent bans to first time offenders. But I have some thoughts about this that I'll PM to you.
terroraustralis - August 27, 2014, 5:54 pm
on the other hand, she does state that even if she wasnt permabanned, she wouldnt come back anyway. she might just be trying to make you look bad, but i cannot think of any reason why she would do so.
terroraustralis - August 27, 2014, 5:51 pm
she seems to think she's been permabanned on her account, and IP banned. she's supplied me with screensh**s which back this up, though the screensh**s dont show the IP address so there is no way to confirm.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 25, 2014, 9:48 pm

I'm not sure what I can tell you. I gave a standard 3 day ban, the entire conversation was right here in the comment section......Why would I lie?
terroraustralis - August 25, 2014, 9:29 pm
"I banned your friend for 3 days, she's welcome back as long as she plays by the rules." could you do me a favour and verify this? i have been contacted by the user in question and she tells a very different story, and i'd like to know who is lieing to me
EmmaRoydes - August 24, 2014, 6:15 pm
*vitriole*
EmmaRoydes - August 24, 2014, 6:13 pm
Nor does it justify your virile nor that of your friends
EmmaRoydes - August 24, 2014, 6:12 pm
Did you ever consider not calling me a f***tard or f***wit and try coming up with counter arguments instead? Just because I have an opinion that doesn't coincide with yours, that doesn't make me stupid or a troll.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 24, 2014, 4:10 pm

I banned your friend for 3 days, she's welcome back as long as she plays by the rules.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 4:08 pm
true, but we can all understand that we all get pissed off at times, and sometimes we overreact, whether it be calling someone mentally handicapped, or accusing a moderator of improper conduct, or banning someone for words they've said in anger.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 24, 2014, 4:05 pm

You have a right to the way you feel, but its a moot point in this context. I cannot ban a member for insulting scientists in general.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 4:03 pm
a scientist being told that their entire profession is a fraud is very similar to a moderator being accused of "helping out friends". we all get angry, what is important is to make sure that if we do make a mistake in anger, that we try to undo it.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 3:52 pm
i dont know about you, but i personally cant say that i've never said something stupid because i was angry. one thing i can personally say that i really dont give a **** about being insulted, what i DO give a **** about is my profession being DEFAMED.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 24, 2014, 3:36 pm

I can't make Emma argue the way you want her to.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 24, 2014, 3:33 pm

The internet is loaded with stupid people, you can't prove who is who and you certainly can't punish someone for being stupid. Try being the bigger man and ignore anyone you don't like, you'll need to learn to do that IRL soon enough anyway.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 3:32 pm
if you dont believe that emmaroydes was being antagonistic, go look at the threads emma has posted in, look at the replies emma gives. do they look to you like an attempt to refute what they are in reply to?
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 3:28 pm
the rules just make that job doable, and provides guidelines. the rules are not infalliable, the rules can have loopholes that prevent users from being punished for clearly antagonistic behaviour, I.E. pretending to be stupid.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 3:26 pm
the moderators exist to stand guard for a healthy community that encourages user contributions, and the primary means of doing this is by punishing or removing people who intentionally antagonise others.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 24, 2014, 3:26 pm

I've been repeating myself for 20 minutes now. It's out of my hands.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 24, 2014, 3:23 pm

It is not about who "deserves to stay". It's about who follows the rules. The guidelines exist to help moderators be impartial.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 24, 2014, 3:18 pm

No. The person who broke the rules while disagreeing with Emma and then insulted a moderator when they were told to stop is no longer contributing to Politifake. The rules exist for a reason.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 3:17 pm
what it really comes down to, is who do you think most deserves to stay? the well spoken person who seems to know what they're talking about, but cant handle being trolled? or the troll? we both know there is no way emma is really as stupid as he pretends
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 3:13 pm
either way, the result is the same. the person who disagreed with emmaroydes is now no longer contributing to politifake. all because emma has perfected the art of pretending to be an insufferable f***wit, and can benefit from it thanks to the rules here.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 24, 2014, 3:13 pm

If you're being provoked into an argument by someone who is following the rules, all you have to do is follow the rules with your responses.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 24, 2014, 3:10 pm

I cannot punish a member for "failing to comprehend or communicate properly". Only for breaking the rules we have in place at every Motinetwork site.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 3:10 pm
no, we get provoked. emma pretends to be stupid, too stupid to be believed, and it pisses people off because they KNOW that emma cant actually be that stupid and still be alive. we're either harassed into leaving, or provoked into a verbal tirade
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 24, 2014, 3:08 pm

Just like the socking accusations, I have my ways of checking if a member is sock puppeting. I can't just go by how many accusations are made and a**umptions....I need evidence.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 24, 2014, 3:06 pm

As long as a member obeys the site rules they can have any opinion they want. If other members break the rules and attack the aforementioned member then it will be the second member who gets banned. How else besides enforcing the rules can I be impartial?
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 3:03 pm
i reported a few, and never got a response, so after that i decided i'd refute some of emma's propaganda to provide a citable example of emma failing to comprehend or communicate properly, to perhaps convince a moderator to step in and do something.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 2:57 pm
the whole reason Vbattalie was so hated is because he constantly pretended to be completely f***ing stupid, and he was so good at until he was under the spotlight of the mods, nobody knew if he was just pretending or if he was really that stupid.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 2:55 pm
long story short, trolling is a disgustingly manipulative tactic for silencing those who disagree with you, it should not be tolerated.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 2:46 pm
emma has, in effect, figured out how to censor opposing views. and its all because the mods cant punish someone for being a f***ing moron, and if someone wants to pretend to be one, there is no way to prove they arent.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 2:41 pm
and when the other user is banned, emma receives no punishment. emma literally pretends to be the stupidest person alive, in order to piss people off, get them to say something that will get them banned, and it is amazingly effective.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 2:38 pm
yes, i think emma does hate scientists. he provokes people by pretending to be a disrespectful a**hole, while never explicitly breaking any actual rules, so that when the moderators step in, the other user is banned.
fauxnews - August 24, 2014, 12:12 pm
Nah,he gets it for being the basa$s soldier and all.I suppose u probably get one too becuz u probably chose the funniest pigeon avatar anyone could choose ;-)haha Would love to buy u all a drink.Maybe someday at a 10yr Politifake reunion.Cheers,mate. :-)
EmmaRoydes - August 24, 2014, 11:32 am
Hey! Wait a minute. I thought you had to do the pigeon avatar thing to get the free pint.
foxrecon19d - August 23, 2014, 2:56 am
Oh, now faux! You know thw only reason I said that was because I'm angling for a free pint once I'm done with this deployment! Take care, my friend ;-)
fauxnews - August 22, 2014, 3:20 pm
Gotta go. And good luck w/ your candidates this year. :-) Will try to swing by after the election to say "hi" if time allows; busy with the family and work. Cheers mate :-D Thanks again for the shout-out. Right back at ya! :-)
fauxnews - August 22, 2014, 3:18 pm
Like,Em, said the trick to this place is seeing like gangster battle rap for nerds, or for political junkies. That way no one takes it too personally. Thanks foxrecon for the words of inspiration. You rock. Always have, always will! *best Elvis voice* X-D
fauxnews - August 22, 2014, 3:16 pm
The funny thing is I know some people think we are enemies but the truth is that there is a mutual respect, mutual understanding,despite our opposing points of view.Sure,we lose our tempers w/each other sometimes.But we're friends at the end of the day
fauxnews - August 22, 2014, 3:13 pm
Someone brought this to my attention! Thank you, fox. =-) Those are very kind words.
EmmaRoydes - August 22, 2014, 9:59 am
but I'm smart enough to not get mouthy with him.
EmmaRoydes - August 22, 2014, 9:57 am
I've had my fair share of slaps from Moooooooooooooooooo.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 21, 2014, 9:57 pm

I don't need to warn you when you're mouthing off at a moderator. bye.
Julie38 - August 21, 2014, 9:56 pm
Hmmmm. So you suspend my account without so much as a warning? I have to LOL at that. Keep telling yourself you are not a control freak. Sorry Mr.T, but you are on your own. Don't worry about the 3 days. Won't be coming back. Have a good one. :)
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 21, 2014, 9:51 pm

I'm not friends with any of the members, all I do is try to keep it civil around here and field everyone's accusations against each other. See you in 3 days.
Julie33 - August 21, 2014, 9:46 pm
Hmmm. Not at all. Not judgmental.Just getting my friend's back.You're getting the back of your troll friend. And all is right in the world. The sun will still rise tomorrow. Pancakes still taste good in the morning. Sober up M. You're drunk on yourself.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 21, 2014, 9:44 pm

So, your method is to lower yourself to the standards of those you call trolls. And that somehow makes you better than them.....I'm not trying to intimidate you, I'm pointing out the rules. I'm not a control freak, I'm the moderator.
Julie33 - August 21, 2014, 9:38 pm
According to Mr.T and others, so did Emma. Amirite?
Julie33 - August 21, 2014, 9:37 pm
Saw what you said to Mr.T. today. You are making other good people pay the price for the trouble caused by one troll? That's not right. I also say what's on my mind because I can. You don't intimate me. You're a control freak. Grow a thicker skin.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 21, 2014, 9:33 pm

You accused Emma of coming here to pick fights, but your first post and a good number of your posts since have been hostile. You don't really get to be judgmental, you came here with an agenda.
Julie33 - August 21, 2014, 9:31 pm
Yup, that is pretty much on the money. Mr.T invited me to help represent the science minded people being trolled. I don't mind getting the back of a friend.
Julie33 - August 21, 2014, 9:28 pm
Where did all that come from? LOL
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 21, 2014, 7:39 pm

....bullying others rights,creepo. So STFU" And you're telling someone else how to behave?!?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 21, 2014, 7:37 pm

Julie33, Your very first post "You are pure,unadulterated bullsh1t. I dont see how this poster takes away the rights of people to have religious beliefs. Hey, abortion is a religious issue! This demotifake is a critique of that.You're the only one ...
Julie33 - August 21, 2014, 3:09 pm
You(and trolls just like you)come to a forum and pick fights with everyone,then you get attacked back,which you then use as an excuse to play the victim.Predictable.When people tell you are being“uncivil”maybe you should listen and do your part to shut up
Julie33 - August 21, 2014, 3:08 pm
When Bart Sibrel lectured Buzz Aldrin about the moon landing being a hoax (sound familiar?) he was punched in the face. He called the police to report a**ault but the judge ruled against Sibrel because he likes to provoke fights, like you. Is that unfair?
Julie33 - August 21, 2014, 3:05 pm
Scientists don't pretend to be infallible. You do. It's not about your opinion being wrong. It's about how you conduct yourself. You use your opinion as a baseball bat across the knees of others. I can hardly blame Mr.T for reacting the way he does.
EmmaRoydes - August 21, 2014, 8:48 am
or do
EmmaRoydes - August 21, 2014, 8:41 am
Scientists have brought us all kinds of wonderful, useful, innovative things and my not buying the climate alarmist thing doesn't mean that I'm not in awe of things that scientists invent.
EmmaRoydes - August 21, 2014, 8:37 am
IPCC Reports are equivalent to a bible and are not influenced by non-scientists.
EmmaRoydes - August 21, 2014, 8:36 am
I don't hate scientists, I just don't think they are infallible and have proven that over the years. When it comes to climate change, they reverse course every 20 years or so. You take things too personally, unless you are a climatoligist who thinks the
EmmaRoydes - August 21, 2014, 8:34 am
you were dropping your f-bombs at that time. And that was over a month ago.
EmmaRoydes - August 21, 2014, 8:34 am
I agree with moo+. If you, TA, think that I've done something that means I should be banned, report it to the mods. Otherwise, just keep carpet bombing f-bombs and claim I'm the ones that's uncivil or hostile. By the way, I went back as far as July 13 and
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 21, 2014, 7:58 am

IMO. most of you give as good as you get.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 21, 2014, 7:57 am

TA. If you want the mods to step in you have to report the posts you're bothered by. You don't get to "deal" with members you don't like. no matter how many members ask you to. You guys all think that you're the ones being insulted...you're all correct.
foxrecon19d - August 21, 2014, 6:30 am
...is right. If we to take things personally, it might be time to step back and re-group and re-focus on who the real enemy are, namely Left-wing conservative, Bible-thumping, global warming supporting, big government Republicans that make us all look bad
foxrecon19d - August 21, 2014, 6:23 am
This poster has a picture of a Bible. But does anyone here REALLY hate someone because of they are Christian? TA is a scientist, but does anyone REALLY hate him because of it? Yeah, this is the internet, so we enjoy some degree of anonymity. But moo(+)...
foxrecon19d - August 21, 2014, 6:18 am
In my platoon, I have les*****, black heavy-metal rockers, white Reggie heroes, nerds, jocks, studs (me), libtards, repubtards, don't give a f##k-tards. Any conflict that we might have between us are personality conflicts as opposed to poliical ones.
foxrecon19d - August 21, 2014, 6:14 am
You're a tro;;. I'm a troll. We're all trolls. I may not be on the same side of the political fence as Terroraustralis or Fauxnews, but I like 'em a lot. V-(word), the name that shall not be mentioned, claimed to be concervative, but he wasn't my favorite
terroraustralis - August 21, 2014, 3:25 am
and since the mods wont step in, the only option i am left with is to give you your own medicine, a healthy dose of persecution and vitriol. and you have the hide to complain at being treated the same way you treat others? wake up to yourself, troll.
terroraustralis - August 21, 2014, 3:23 am
you have a grudge against scientists, you speak of them as though they are scum, well i'm a scientist and i'm not f***ing okay with that. you make every scientist here feel persecuted, i have gotten PMs asking me to deal with you from multiple people.
terroraustralis - August 21, 2014, 3:21 am
look back to about two weeks ago, when i still gave a f*** about your opinion, you'll see that all of my posts are civil. the only reaason my recent posts arent, is becauase you're disrespectful and insulting to everyone who chose the same career as me.
terroraustralis - August 21, 2014, 3:20 am
and i dont think its right to punish someone for responding with open hostility, because open hostility is the only correct response to thinly veilled hostility and insults to everyone who follows a certain career path. he IS a troll and you know it.
terroraustralis - August 21, 2014, 3:17 am
sorry mate, but this guy really pisses me off, he pisses everyone off, he does not know how to argue, and is incapable of understanding anything you say to him. he's driving other politifake members away.
EmmaRoydes - August 20, 2014, 8:28 pm
What? Me uncivil? I'm only that way when I respond in kind. I've even had normal discussions in the forum with terror when he doesn't go off the deep end.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 20, 2014, 7:58 pm

What the hell Terroraustralis? You know the rules about name calling, you should know by now not to bring up Vicky, you don't get to decide who belongs here and you're swearing up a storm. Chill out, you're making Emma look civil.
EmmaRoydes - August 20, 2014, 5:13 pm
How many postings of yours don't contain f-bombs? go back and count them and we can talk about civility and hostility
EmmaRoydes - August 20, 2014, 5:12 pm
right back at you. Did you think out your posting before you wrote about trolling and hostility? You might want to consider looking inward before you make accusations about anyone else.
terroraustralis - August 20, 2014, 1:54 pm
you're a f***ing troll, no better than vbattalie, you deserve to be banned, because you're incapable of having a non-hostile discussion, and completely incapable of understanding a single f***ing word anyone says to you. you dont belong here.
terroraustralis - August 20, 2014, 1:53 pm
i've had to do units on climate change and environmental science as part of my degree, you f***ing havent. but why are we discussing me? oh, right, because you're too f***ing stupid to counter my argument, so instead you accuse me of not being qualified.
EmmaRoydes - August 20, 2014, 1:21 pm
your comment #70209 - er, ahem, sounds exactly like what you are doing TA. Oh, I'm sorry, did you do the research and come up with the alarmists conclusions? No, kind of makes your arguments irrelevant and invalid according to your "logic".
terroraustralis - August 20, 2014, 9:21 am
yeah, but its f***ing nothing compared to the money thats in oil.
terroraustralis - August 20, 2014, 9:20 am
i've never seen an economy collapse due to environmental policies, mostly because next-to-nothing has been done by any government, and i dont see how it has anything to do with who is right or wrong, you're basically just demonising environmentalists.
terroraustralis - August 20, 2014, 9:18 am
true, but what would the government gain from doing it? ending our dependency on foreign oil? there is no way our politicians are that farsighted.
terroraustralis - August 20, 2014, 8:34 am
3) nuclear fusion (best possible energy source, expected to become viable within the next 10 years, will unlock the power neccesary for interstellar voyages and colonising other planets) 4) biofuels (for places and situations where solar is not effective)
terroraustralis - August 20, 2014, 8:32 am
what we need to do is throw money into research on 4 things: 1) solar (not great, but guaranteed to work, and keep us going until fusion or fission are economical. 2) 4th gen fission reactors (the backup plan if fusion doesnt work)
terroraustralis - August 20, 2014, 8:31 am
it will be through war, and increasingly authoritarian governments that disregard the rights of their citizens in favour of comitting war crimes to keep the price of gas at reasonable levels.
terroraustralis - August 20, 2014, 8:29 am
personally i'm split 50/50 on whether the CO2 rise will really ever impact humanity, given current geopolitical tensions, peak oil and economic troubles. oil IS going to kill us if we dont develop alternate energy sources, but it wont be through CO2...
terroraustralis - August 20, 2014, 8:28 am
i do agree that calm is neccesary, but recorded levels of CO2 rise since the industrial revolution are d***ing evidence that humanity is responsible, and the theory makes sense under the laws of physics that we know of.
EmmaRoydes - August 18, 2014, 9:56 pm
back into the wealthy peoples' pockets - think Al Gore, etc) There's a lot of money in GW, not much if GW turns out to be a hoax.
EmmaRoydes - August 18, 2014, 9:55 pm
It might have something to do with greenies collapsing economies in futile attempts to force governments to make poor people poorer (high electricity prices, water, etc) and wealthy people wealthier (they pump money into government who then pump money
EmmaRoydes - August 18, 2014, 9:53 pm
Could be a combination of government and oil companies conspiring.
Curlyrocks - August 18, 2014, 6:57 pm
It would also be nice to see some actual science but lately the only side making posters with facts on them are the anti-GW panic side. We may be looking at the facts all wrong but it sure beats mocking people.
Curlyrocks - August 18, 2014, 6:54 pm
it's better than another but falls into the exact same pattern of behavior, and often times thinks that when there group does it it is better, embracing their hypocrisy rather than sorting themselves out.
Curlyrocks - August 18, 2014, 6:53 pm
the climate will change like it always has, human caused or not. And for the record I too want out of the GW debate but then daily there's a new poster mocking people for not believing what they believe. it's infuriating to think that 1 group thinks
Curlyrocks - August 18, 2014, 6:49 pm
the scientists paid by the oil companies arn't necessarily appealing for calm because it's the right thing to do, it's obviously about money, but calming down is the right thing to do. The worlds not doomed, CO2 will not cause the world to get too h**..
Curlyrocks - August 18, 2014, 6:46 pm
its climate does that often. Life adapts and so do humans. I don't think it's a conspiracy from either side. I think its people blowing a smaller issue out of proportion, exaggerating, panicking and causing other people to panic as humans often do. I know
Curlyrocks - August 18, 2014, 6:41 pm
scientists are only experts in 1 specific field, and they're human. They start to put things together with the other information they have all wrong and that's where these stupid "Day After Tomorrow" dooms day trash comes from. Yes the earth is changing..
Curlyrocks - August 18, 2014, 6:39 pm
It doesn't just take 1 scientist or type of scientist to figure out what's going on with the climate. It takes a lot of people doing a lot of different jobs to study ice samples, check CO2 levels, investigate the sun and so on. The problem is that the


THE HOLY BIBLE - Ain't nothing "progressive" about this Bronze Age text.




Dhimmi-in-Chief -




PREV PAGE